Drowned in Sound Festivals

Search



Sigur Ros ( ) Coverart

Sigur Rós: ( )

no votes
?
by Sean Adams
  • Type: Album
  • Release date: 28/10/2002
  • Label: Fat Cat
Enjoy.
It’s yours to discover.
( ) is..
…as urgent as hair growing, skin dying, memories fading, ice melting; mundane things changing…
…a beautiful, graceful, monumentally uplifting, sun setting; existential trip…

Gravity kicked in and it rattled as it went. A irreplaceable gift, tumbling, spinning, falling down a shadowy, infinite crevasse, to the centre of the earth. A locket that slipped from my frail ice burnt hands. Hands now bleeding from solidifying heart shaped tears tearing at my skin, perserving my pain, tracing where the locket slipped. I cry because I lost the one thing I had left from my life-long love...

Today I don’t care. I don't give a.. because it's this opus that makes me cry. Blub like the moment when I realised one day every special person I’ve ever met will die, they’ll be no more, ashes to ashes. Everyday, I feel the same pain as that day when butterflies became lemmings in the pit of my guts. Every single day, from then 'til now. Nihilistic thoughts morning, noon and night, pop the idea of death back into my tie-strangled head. And I weep because of dreams of gravity, where I lost that locket.

You probably (should) know all the hype about them being R’heads favourite band. And about them coming from Iceland, where snow is as enchanting as the sea to Hawaiians. You’ve heard the jazz about their lyrics being written in a made up lingo, haven't you? They're a band-of-bands so you’ll know bits and bobs via revelations from the heads and practice rooms of those who you admire and respect. It’s because of things (words can't do justice) like this gentle soundtrack to your dreams.

It’s a kinda classical style with textures, nuances, incomprehensibly complex song structures and melodies. You'll know nothing about them.

My heart breaks in half.
Atoms, split ( imperfectly ), both halves similar and unique in their own little ways.
Centred by chilling silence, just like the title. This album is challenge-ingly long but so is the debate around the albums title (brackets around nothing) and the mystique and the connotations. To some people the lack of symbolic marks anywhere on the packaging, no communication, just a hand-written “Sigur Rós”, says a lot.
Leave nothing but footprints.
Less is more.

Straight down the middlers hate them, they call them pretentious, but they’d probably incinerate works of art if someone politely asked them to.

None of the tracks are titled (that’s how to overcome people downloading your album!?). On record, all these nothings say something in their time-detached tongues of Jon Thor. Stoner rock could never be this psychedelic. A piano alone could never share this much emotion... I could try and document everything on this record but I can’t and I won’t. It’s like trying to explain the floating post-orgasm feeling to an innocent.

If you already know and adore Sigur Rós or Fat Cat's recent lo-fi/electronica/amazing releases, which most of our generation will be discovering in 40years time, then this album will be no surprise, it is more of the same cool classical, which is by no means a bad thing.

...Yet through all this, beyond the world flashing by me, I want to smile. I want to be ravaged by hope. Hope that one day in a future-life that I’m taken back, 400 years, to the edge of that tectonic fault, down beyond the ice, past generation after generation of embalmed ages. Down through the volcanic crust. Age after age. Beyond the chasms, the ravines and into the raging heart where the love lies. Standing, united, her hand clasped around mine, the symbol of our love at our feet. Our dancing eyes wondering whether it’s our something that we see flickering in dreams. The morning after, I will feel touched. I'll be running around, spring in my skip, sprinkling flowers as I go, divulging details to blue people about this prettiness, the joys, the magic, the something I don’t quite understand. I don’t want the magic or mystery taken away from me. I just want to believe.

( ) is…
…as pioneering, unnerving, inspiring, confusing, as lyrically anarchic as every thing that has moved the world, ever.
…why I love music, why this website has this name and why art exists.
( )’s yours to discover.
Enjoy.


Sigur Ros - ( )

I don't mind sigur ros, but the non-album/song title thang was done way back by Labradford, Eno and a host of other ambient-based noisemakers.

Re: Sigur Ros - ( )

Beautiful review. If this album is anything like the other, i won't b able to live without it. Looks like the new rock revival will be off my stereo for a while :)

Sublime review

Flowers of pain dripped through fingers shorn of fingernails. Buzzing and clicking in the morning-smile of all the frightened children. I read his words and all the broken bits of life I keep to build a nest from, catch fire in the glare of the monitors lght. The cursor blinks like the eyelids of a shattered mirror-girl.

Oh come on. You were dumped. You bought a nice album. You had some bad poetry. You interspersed it with tenuous links to album. Can we just admit it was the most embarassing bolus of shit any of us have ever had the misfortune to come across?

Can we?

Huh?

Love Yash.

Re: Sublime review

he has a girlfriend actually.

Re: Sublime review

not any more if she reads this.

Re: Sublime review

perfectly worded.

Re: Sigur Ros - ( )

I think this album is much more uplifting and awakening than your review implies. Yeah, it grabs your heart and squeezes it and you almost find yourself grasping for breath and choking back tears, but I don't think they're necessarily tears of sadness. I think they're more just tears of overwhelmed emotion, just a release of everything and it's all most about that feeling of floating and being calm, content and untouchable afterwards.


I also think this album does have some much heavier, urgent moments. At points, when I saw them a few weeks ago, everything was frantic. The piano, the bowing and almost viscious basslines.

See, I don't think Sigur Ros ARE pretentious. I mean, obviously they're working the whole "this is art" angle of things, but having been brought up listening to classical music I think it's more a matter of really sitting down on your own and LISTENING to the music... *then* you'll get it. They aren't rock stars.. or pop stars. They aren't gonna sit down and write a nice little verse1/bridge/chorus/verse2 pop song especially to make the fat balding office types at their label happy. They're professional, accomplished musicians.

One of you said about them not being able to read msuic - doesn't that just make this album all the more valid? It's not being worked out throught the mathematics of what time and key signature "sounds best". It's just emotion and energy being thrown at some intruments and seeing what happens. How can you NAME that? And what's the point?

KPxx



Re: Sigur Ros - ( )

Good points, not that I agree with all of them.


Re: Sigur Ros - ( )

what dont you agree with?

Re: Sigur Ros - ( )

All music is worked out to mathematical time signatures

Sigur Ros - ( )

When people like you Sean get to reviewe such amazing bands it makes me want to cry :( and I wish somebody like Mr Eyers or even dare I say Miss Price...would have been given the privlage...

Sigur Rós - ( )

One of the best reviews I've ever read on this site - it encapsulates everything about the album and the band. I wish all reviews could be like this, it sent a shiver down my spine when I read it.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Oi! stop breaking the rules. sean is shit. all you can say about him is that he IS shit. surely shirley? c'mon, this review isn't THAT good. I mean, it's better than some stuff, but it shouldn't make you shiver.
get a coat.

Sigur Rós - ( )

Sorry, they are capable of beauty, but they ARE pretentious.

Listen to Múm instead, maybe a bit of Boards of Canada.

Godspeed You! Black Emperor and Sigur Ros are well aware that they come across as smug and pretentious and enjoy it. They aren't bad bands, I just dislike the members. Oh, and with all these bands they produce just as many dull songs as they do beautiful ones.

Geez, never yawn at a Sigur Ros gig. I did....

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

I dunno.

I've read some interviews with Sigur Ros recently and it sounds like only one of them can even read music, so i dunno about them being really muso, which probably explains the hit'n'miss-ness you mention.

Boards Of Canada are not the same kinda band at all, their music is loads more sinister and bleeping. urgh.

Godspeed I still gotta investigate, what's worth getting?

You can hate bands and love their music, it's not impossible. If you dont like them as people, dont read interviews with them...

I dunno.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Boards of Canada are nothing like Sigur Ros are they really? They r really good but are at least as muso as the 'Ros. Mum are mediocre at best. And as hit and miss.

Godspeed are weird and occasionally frightening. Probably worth listening to, but consider before you buy. Not as immediate as Sigur Ros, and a lot darker

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

transcendant music

sublime review

stunted responses

universes, forests and weeds - all part of creation

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Pah, Múm are excellent :)

Godspeed You! Black Emperor (Formerly Godspeed You Black Emperor!) are indeed very sinister. Try the song 'Lift Your Skinny Fists Like Antenna (not sure sp?)To Heaven'. It's a tearjerker. Simply stunning.

Boards Of Canada I feel should be placed in the same catergory as Mum, GY!BE and Sigur Ros. I think the style IS similar and they all evoke similar feelings within me.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Godspeed have some extremly intense moments, and some beautiful ones. Their arrangement use of speech samples over music can be sometimes genius, which adds to the atmosphere of the track. But their music can be a bit hard-going at times, and as I said, a tad samey...

I need to buy some Sigur Rós albums...

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

you lot all need to listen to some xinlisupreme.

lm/

o
o
o
<><...
Gen

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Buy anything by godspeed and the majority of you CD collection will seem silly, insignificant and worthless, the only bands that can really stand up to them are Sigur Ros.

Try their EP first, Slow Riot for new zero kanada - the most powerful two pieces of music i have ever heard. If you don't like it, i feel sorry for you...

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

you disklike the members?

do you know them then?

they're 4 of the most unpretentious people i've ever met.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

i agree. i wouldn't judge anyone until i met them face to face, and even then i can't say i really "know" half the people that i do know face to face. i wouldn't make any generalizations about what people are like until you get to know them as a person.


and besides...everyone has different standards. what is pretentious to you may not be to them, thus could you really know what was pretentious to begin with?

-who ate the fish

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Mum and boards of canada come nowhere near the sheer beauty of Sigur Ros. I you find it boring and yawn at shows perhaps you should throw on some rap rock of a little pop to keep your short attention span in check

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

You patronising tit. Not all rock music needs to be 10 minutes long with made up words attached, you know. nor does it need to be rap rock. Does it make you feel better? Urgh.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Or maybe I was just tired. You certainly win the Most Moronic Post Ever award.

I'm a not a fan of 'rap rock' and not a fan of the 'pop' music you were probably refering to. You're a very smug git.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Godspeed....Oh god.

They have an LP out next month. Albini has something to do with it. It sounds like the rest of their stuff. I used to really like them but the reptitive nature of "oh we can make the same kind of elongated guitar noises (in the same order) and push the boundaries of post-rock at the same time" just gets on your tits eventually. Slow Riot For New Zero Kanada was an excellent record, but they havn't really excelled beyond that. Infact most of the rest of their good stuff sound strikingly similar. Ho hum.

I do quite like Explosions In The Sky though, which probably contradicts everything I just said.

hey stc

you're right, this review is awful!!!!

Sigur Rós - ( )

this is the most shit and artsy wanna be review i've ever come across.
sean, you're bring this site down. look at yourself and don't try to be a music intellectual. stop being so big headed about yourself.

i can't believe i'm even wasting time writing this about such a crap review. it should just be forgotten.it was probably a bad day.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

What's so wrong with you people.

A lot of people liked it. A lot hated it. That is only a good thing. Contrast.

It's a review written inspired by the record. It's not a true story. It's symmetrical and paradoxical on purpose. You can't write about such an amazing record in a monotone arseface manner. It wouldnt do the record justice, let alone the band.

If you dont like the review you probably wont like the band. End of story.


Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

I agree it was a shit review. And I like Sigur Ros.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

I am the real Raz. I didn't write the last comment. This is why you gotta use yer login usernames. So there can be no imitations.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

translation: "I'm as good as Sigur Ros"

Sure you are, Sean

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

That's not what i meant at all!

I just don't see the point of writing the expected press release paralell when it's a helluva lot more interesting to take what the record puts into you and run with it...

Sigur Rós - ( )

this article reminds me of the grotesqueness of masturbation only verbally. please, if you wish to convey information about music and your opinions do so, if you wish to convey obscure ramblings with no specific relevance to the subject then become a 'creative writer'.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

You're a bit quick on the uptake aren't you.

Sigur Ros are so last season, daaarling.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Where's the discovery and moment of epiphany if a "music journalist" deconstructs an entire record for you? What right does some "hack" sat behind a computer have to comment on the genius and beauty captured in a studio and put on a record?

Yeah, maybe because a band has recorded it gives the world a right to pass judgement on it. And maybe because I've written a review it gives the world the right to pass judgement on my judgement. But fuck me, there are better things in life and some things should never be taken apart, some things just ARE and I believe my review takes anyone who's ever heard Sigur Rós into the realm of '( )' and gives anyone who's never heard them an idea of what they're about.

I hate justifying myself, but I'm sick of these snide comments from people who have nothing better to do, who don't seem to know what they want, but are more than happy to give people shit for being different.

Rant over.

Sean

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

sean, the problem is that you're not very clever, and as such your conceptual "reviews" are about as insightful and witty as bobby davro's jokes.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

i disagree, i feel that a 'hack' in your position should be making judgments, stating opinions and reviewing, not trying to capture the essence of the studio with a stream of poetic nonsense. this is not a snide comment, im merely attempting to get across my own opinions about the way in which you have dealt with several of your reveiws. im sorry if you feel that i've given you 'shit' but you're not being different, you're just using words to pad out a to be honest a rubbish review. admit defeat.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

You go on and on about contemporary bands 'plundering' the past, 'copying' others and not doing a great job of it, and here's you writing some insipid, wannabe-beat poet shite that tells us nothing about the record, other than you thought it would be a good idea to take mind-spazzing drugs while listening, and subsequently churn out some frankly awful 6th-form poetry 'in the style' of your poetic heroes, while entirely missing the point that they were poets because they could write poetry that meant something, while you are a DiS writer who writes laughable music reviews on inconsequential bands whose sole reason for existing is to soundtrack the artful lovemaking of a million art students.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

I've met him. He doesn't do drugs.
And a million art students is a "bigger market" than a few thousand people in leather listening to the liberstrokites. What's your point?
You repeating yourself and attaking sean is getting boring.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Maybe I was a bit harsh on Sigur Ros.

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

Sean on drugs..... now that's a worrying thought.
His mind's warped enough as it is, he doesn't need acid. Man. :-P

Re: Sigur Rós - ( )

dont feel attacked or ridiculed in any way. this is a comments board i commented. hopefully it has opened up the possibility of discussing what constitutes a 'reveiw' and what constitutes a personal reaction to somthing. consider this the last posting on the mud slinging chain

Sigur Rós - ( )

Wow, sigur ros is flipping amazing. By far on the most talented bands and most creative I have ever listened to. I'd say they are close to being up there with Radiohead. They aren't Radiohead good, far from it, but closer to it than other bands.

Sigur Rós - ( )

when i see you i'm gonna knife you

Sigur Rós - ( )

sigur are amazing. you can tell from listening musically they are coming from somewhere totally unique, so it is pointless pigeon holing them into they are this they are that etc. unlike fashion rock 'The' bands who seem to want to be pigeonholed. dressing and havin haircuts to gain cred? wotever happened to the MUSIC! 60s n 70s r truly dead. things that make a band famous and adored:
1. Drug Problem?
2. Clothes
3. They're 'real' (like j lo lol)
4. Haircuts
5. Name
6. Who they namecheck (ake sure namechecked bands
are in current correct area of retroness)
>
>
>
>
7894234678. Their music. dont really matter as long as they play it at a guerrilla gig.

Pisses me off.

Sigur Ros rule. so do radiohead lol