Already nominated for a Polaris Prize – the Canadian equivalent of the Mercury – much has already been said about the debut album by Montreal psychedelic popsters Miracle Fortress.
The band’s songwriter and principal member is Graham Van Pelt – by day a studio engineer and member of rock band Think About Life. Seemingly they’re in-the-know indie royalty.
So it’s a disappointment to find that Five Roses is not the second coming of Kevin Shields, merely a pretty decent stab at a pretty, if heavily Beach Boys-influenced, psych-pop record.
There are many good moments on the album; indeed, there are some excellent ones. Five Roses starts well, with the fuzz guitars and Cure-esque keyboards of ‘Have You Seen In Your Dreams’ and the sweet Brian-Wilson vocals and swirling sounds of ‘Maybe Lately’.
‘Hold Your Secrets To Your Heart’ is the finest moment of the record; a three-and-a-half minute swoon of fragility and child-like bliss. Even if it does sound suspiciously like Primal Scream’s ‘Keep Your Dreams’.
But there is no real consistency throughout Five Roses, and it tails off six or seven songs in. ‘Next Train’ is, in theory, a great song, but takes too long to reach any climax, and does so messily. There’s an art in sounding like you’re making music that’s not rigid or off the cuff, and it’s not quite perfected here. ‘Beach Baby’ manages to sound more like a broken-down ice cream van and drones rather than lifts; ‘Poetaster’ is a slightly clumsy acoustic number; and ‘Blasphemy’ once again fails to resolve itself before you find yourself twitching your finger over the skip button.
Five Roses is certainly not a poor album – it’s largely enjoyable, in fact – but it fails to inspire awe or create any sense of joy. It’s too slight, and too meandering; it neither contains the phenomenal intricacies and soundscapes of My Bloody Valentine’s Loveless nor the challenging fight of Sonic Youth’s Daydream Nation. It lacks the pop genius of Radio Dept’s Lesser Matters.
It is, in short, not quite what it could have been.

This is one of the albums of the year
So your wrong
FACE!
Better Review
http://arts.guardian.co.uk/filmandmusic/story/0,,2129924,00.html
Better review because you agree with it?
x
Of course...
...their reviews tend to be gash anyway, five stars wooooyaaaaa
Very very wrong indeed
It failed to create any sense of joy? Then you must be DEAD good sir.
I agree
just picked this up as it was in Rough Trade's albums of the year, magical stuff
I've got to say...
... this is at least an 8 in my book. First few listens didn't do much for me, admittedly, but it reveals itself over time to be a really good record.
great album
i'd give it an eight.
last three songs are seriously good
first 9 ive not really got into yet
Ugh.
This is the most piss-poor review I've read. Not because of your opinion of the album, but because a 6th grader could have done a better job.